The shop has been fine without a website for 74 years. Why now? +
It has been fine. The case for a website now is not commerce, because the shop is explicitly not an online shop and you have said so on the record. The case is preservation and discoverability. The 1952 founding story currently lives on other people's websites, the parked thediskery.com domain redirects to a for-sale page, and the queries "oldest record shop Birmingham" and "Britain's oldest record shop" are won by directory listings the shop does not own. A simple brochure site fixes both. It does not ask The Diskery to start selling online, and it does not change anything about how the shop runs day to day.
Will this turn The Diskery into an online record shop? +
No, and the rebuild explicitly says so. The proposed homepage carries the Lee Dearn quote ("If I wanted to sell records on the internet, why own a record shop in the first place?") in a callout. The site is a brochure, a story page, an hours page and a how-to-find-us page. There is no shopping cart, no online stock listing and no mail-order form. If you ever change your mind on commerce that is a separate conversation.
Who writes the founding story and the stock copy? I am not a writer. +
I write the first draft from the Long Live Vinyl piece, the Graham Jones blog and the Ikon Gallery feature, plus a 45-minute phone call with you to fill in the bits that have never been printed. You read it back, mark up anything that is wrong or that you would say differently, I rewrite it. Two rounds and it is done. The first draft is yours to keep regardless of whether we ship the site.
I do not have a brand or a logo. Is that a problem? +
No. The painted signwriting on the fascia is the brand. Deep blue lettering, cream fascia, the vertical "RECORDS" stencils between the window bays. I photograph the shopfront and use the type and the colour palette directly, the way it already exists in real life. There is no logo design exercise, no rebrand, no "let's explore some options" deck. The shop signed itself in 1972 and that signature is what the website uses.
What happens to the Facebook page? +
It stays exactly as it is. Facebook is good at the things Facebook is good at (daily posts, gigs, customer photos, recent arrivals). The website is good at the things Facebook is bad at (heritage copy, hours, address, schema for Google and AI assistants, a single citeable URL for journalists). The two complement each other. The website links to the Facebook page at the top of the visit section; the Facebook bio links to the website.